Find the clause
DFARS 252.204-7012 in your contract means the 110 requirements, a 72-hour incident report and flow-down to subcontractors. DFARS 7019 and 7020 mean a current SPRS score before award.
Federal & defense · NIST / DFARS 252.204-7012
The 110 controls behind CMMC Level 2 and every DFARS 7012 contract. Rev 2 remains the contractual baseline.
Rather skip the call? Get a fixed-fee NIST 800-171 quote in writing.
Who it applies to
Each industry page names the regulation, the obligation and the clock, tells the story of an owner in that trade, and shows what we protect for them.
Defense manufacturers, engineering and design firms, and IT and service suppliers of 10 to 300 people handling CUI
Suppliers who need a current, defensible SPRS score now and a clear path toward Level 2 later
What it asks for
A note on authority: the regulator, auditor or certifying body has the final say on whether you comply. We help interpret the requirements, scope what applies, gap-assess against what is published today, and keep you compliance-ready and secure as the guidance evolves. We hold no regulatory authority and do not certify.
CMMC in more detail: the certification path · what drives the cost · the 12-item checklist · rehearsing the C3PAO assessment
Where it starts
The 110 requirements are the substance of CMMC Level 2 and the condition of every DFARS 7012 contract. The clause has required them since 2017; the CMMC pause did not touch it.
We score you honestly against Revision 2, write the system security plan and the POA&M, post a score you can defend, and track the Revision 3 changes so the move is easy later.
Trace the CUI: tick where it goes
Tick where CUI goes and we show the boundary the 110 requirements apply to.
The steps
The whole NIST SP 800-171 journey, short version. We handle every step with you.
DFARS 252.204-7012 in your contract means the 110 requirements, a 72-hour incident report and flow-down to subcontractors. DFARS 7019 and 7020 mean a current SPRS score before award.
Where CUI arrives, where it is stored, which machines read it and who can reach it. A small boundary is a small assessment; CUI spread across every laptop is the expensive version.
With AccuSights: we trace the CUI flow with you on the intake form and a call, and put the boundary in writing before anyone buys an enclave.
Each requirement met, not met or not applicable, using the DoD assessment methodology. The score starts at 110 and can fall to negative 203. An inflated score is a False Claims Act problem; an honest one is a plan.
With AccuSights: your engineer scores it the way an assessor would, so the number you post in SPRS is one you can defend.
MFA on CUI systems, FIPS-validated encryption, logging, access control, incident response, and the system security plan that describes how each requirement is met. The POA&M lists what is still open, with owners and dates.
With AccuSights: remediation is in-house or with your IT provider, and we write the SSP and the POA&M in assessor language.
The affirmation is yearly, and a senior official signs it. Controls that drift between affirmations are the risk: a new hire without MFA, a laptop outside the boundary, a log nobody reads.
Does it pay for itself
Most of a supplier's hours go into the SSP and the POA&M, which a platform tracks but does not write. Half is a fair starting guess for evidence; lower for the documents.
With AccuSights: our endpoint agent and monitoring watch the boundary around the clock and flag the drift to your engineer.
The score, the SSP date and the date you expect to reach 110 go in SPRS. Primes read it. So does the Justice Department when a score is inflated.
With AccuSights: we post it with you and update it as the POA&M closes.
Why AccuSights
Most compliance platforms assume you have a security team. We built this for the companies that do not.
One fixed fee, scoped from the intake form and put in writing. No seat math, no surprise add-ons at renewal.
Our own agent collects device evidence from every laptop and server automatically. You do not need to buy or configure an enterprise MDM first.
A named engineer guides every step, answers the "how far do we take this control?" questions and stays through the audit.
One control set is mapped to every framework you carry, so evidence is produced once and reused.
What it costs
Here is what is published, with who published it and when.
Our part is a fixed fee. Tell us about your environment on the short intake form and you have a number in writing within 24 hours of sending it back.
Vanta alternatives compared · Drata alternatives compared · Comparing us with Vanta · Comparing us with Drata · Comparing us with Secureframe · See all AccuSights pricing
Read more
Questions
Also in Federal & defense: CMMC 2.0 · CJIS 6.0 · every framework by industry
Next step
Book the demo and see how one control set carries NIST 800-171 and everything else you owe. Or leave your details and an engineer replies within one business day.